Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

aliens
This was a discussion rather than a panel; facilitated by Juliana. These are my somewhat disorganized notes. Feel free to point out any errors, or make any additions in comments. Sometimes I just wrote down authors or titles without any context!

*Buffy-verse: all the Slayers are female. I mentioned a fanfic I heard of, where a Slayer transitions to male but keeps his powers.

*Temeraire books by Naomi Novik. The Longwing dragons only choose female riders, but how do we know how the author is defining male and female? Maybe *most* of the Longwings choose female riders, but the occasional one wouldn't, and that might be regarded like queerness is in our culture. Someone also mentioned a fanfic dealing with a trans rider (FtM I think) who was supposed to inherit a Longwing. Also the dragons seem to think less about gender than the people do.

*A Companion to Wolves by Monette and Bear
*Babel 17 by Samuel Delaney</i>
*Glass House by Charles Strauss
*Cetaganda and Ethan of Athos by Lois McMaster Bujold
*Xenogenesis books by Octavia Butler
*The Gods Themselves by Isaac Asimov
*The Sparrow by Mary Doria Russell
*Richard K. Morgan
*"Torch of Honor" or perhaps the sequel--switching gender
*Grant Morrison's "The Invisisbles" (comics)
*Terry Goodkin (faily) binary magical powers between men and women
*Dune - the Bene Gesserit have secret powers around reproduction, but their ultimate goal is still male power
*China Mieville's books: the Kepri have a large division between male and female. The females are sentient and the males are basically cockroackes.
*Terry Pratchett - male and female dwarves looks the same. Monstous Regiment and Men at Arms were mentioned, but there are many Discworld books.
*Emma Bull, Finder
*Laurie Marks, the "Logic" books. Women and men are truly equal in these books, seen as soldiers and farmers and co-parents.
*Scott Sigler
*The concept of covens vs. singular male wizards. Or if male wizards are in a group, they are a secret society trying to do harm of some kind.
*Gate to Women's Country (faily, gender-essentialist)
*I ranted about my loathing for the "Hominid" trilogy by Robert J. Sawyer. They have some cool interesting concepts (all the Neanderthals are bisexual), but do a lot of gender-essentialist things and want to address the "problem of male violence".

*Star Trek. The trill are genderless, but have the experiences of male and female hosts. Some species use pheromones to control men, which is the ultimate sexual power.

*Transformers - why are they all male? Why can't they just TRANSFORM into female?

*Godzilla is female in the newest movie adaptation

*AIs as gendered vs. gender-neutral

Overall, I thought this was a very good discussion! Good depth.

Comments

( 21 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]littlebutfierce wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 08:53 pm (UTC)
*Transformers - why are they all male?

*boggles* Was no one there who remembered the '80s Transformers movie? I was so excited that they finally had a female Transformer, but she was PINK & pretty boring. (I realize she was a token! I'm just surprised no one mentioned that technically they weren't all male...)

I can't even remember what might be gender/species-y in Finder--bizarre, I used to love that book (probably still would, if I could get over my disgust w/the author).

I think Juliana was worried before that all/most of the discussion would be about werewolves, hehehe.
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 09:04 pm (UTC)
Oh, someone did remember the pink transformer! It just didn't make it into my notes. But there definitely was that moment where someone recalled the ONE female transformer. Someone else said that in the new(er) stories, all the female ones are supposed to have died in the destruction of the Transformer homeworld, and that is where the groans came from about "well, why can't they just TRANSFORM into FEMALE?!" And funny comments about electrical sockets or something.

I don't remember what anyone said about Finder.

Yeah I think Juliana mentioned paranormal romance, but almost no one else in the room had read any of those!
[info]j00j wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 09:51 pm (UTC)
I think the issue with Finder was that the gender of the protagonist (assuming we're remembering the right book-- it was definitely an Emma Bull book) wasn't mentioned for most of it.
[info]littlebutfierce wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 10:03 pm (UTC)
Different title--I know the one you're talking about... I think Bone Dance? Finder was a Bordertown novel. I'm glad I didn't blank out on anything super-genderly-interesting in that one!
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:42 am (UTC)
Tangentially, do you happen to know the title or author of a book that was discussed at WisCon 31 where the sex of the narrator is never mentioned? I know that is very little to go on! I remember it being brought up at the "Third Categories" panel.
[info]boxofdelights wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:01 am (UTC)
Was it SF? In other genres, there are the Hilary Tamar mysteries, by Sarah Caudwell. Or _Sexing the Cherry_, by Jeanette Winterson.
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 02:08 am (UTC)
Thank you! I don't remember if it was SF or not. Only that the reader tended to project a certain gender onto the narrator even while it was never mentioned.
[info]boxofdelights wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 04:38 am (UTC)
I found this list:

Seriously Incomplete Bibliography of Fiction in Which Gender is Eliminated or Ambiguous

which reminds me that it's _Written on the Body_, not _Sexing the Cherry_, that has the ambiguous narrator.

Not all the titles on that list have gender-undeclared narrators, but I'll bet the one you're looking for is there.

And oh, yes, the subject of reader projection of gender is so fascinating! I expect future generations of grad students to mine many dissertations from the responses to Usenet posters who do not make their gender clear. Or even those who do! I go by Susan, but I have been referred to as 'he' at times.

Edited at 2009-07-03 04:41 am (UTC)
[info]hello_momma wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 10:44 pm (UTC)
I don't see why the transformers should have any gender. They are robots, they don't breed right? I know there were more females than the one you mention. If I recall correctly they had a beast wars one that was a spider and I think she was the leader of the decepticons. I'm guessing the voices are all male because they were marketed for little boys.
[info]raanve wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 11:51 pm (UTC)
I don't see why the transformers should have any gender. They are robots, they don't breed right?

I think the trouble with this is that rarely are we shown any sort of robot/AI in SF (or, I guess I should say, USA-SF) that's not gendered in some fashion. So it's not a case of whether or not they should have gender (robots don't need them, unless they are granted them by humans, or "need" them for the purposes of interacting with humans in some way), but simply that they are gendered and that gender is typically male.

Most likely you're right that they are gendered/voiced as male for purposes of hitting a target market -- that sort of deconstruction is useful, but doesn't really answer questions about why the world of the series is the way it is. (For example, that the female transformers were all destroyed somehow off-screen. Which is kind of a messed-up explanation, if you ask me.)
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:34 am (UTC)
GREAT icon!

I do wonder if the people who write these stories think that humans (in general, or the target market in particular) are more comfortable having robots/AIs gendered as opposed to genderless. Certainly almost all AI characters in movies are gendered even though the don't need to be. Or, they can switch genders very easily. The terminators can do this, for example, but they still go back to their default form after switching, and that default form is gendered. Having genderless characters would be subversive and I suspect the big moviemakers don't want to do that!

[info]nabonidus wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:32 am (UTC)
Is the Bene Gesserit's goal really male power? I'm rereading Heretics and Chapterhouse right now so as to eventually read Hunters and Sandworms, and I'm not getting that at all. They're actually trying to start a religious movement focused on Sheeana. The Honored Matres also need to be in this discussion.

Closely related to Dune, Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time definitely needs mentioning here, with the differences between saidar (female magic) and saidin (male magic).
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:40 am (UTC)
I haven't read past the first three Dune books, and that was years ago. It was mentioned in the discussion but not discussed at length.

I also haven't read Robert Jordan, although I think the concept of men and women having different forms of magic is interesting, and also potentially essentialist. It makes me wonder again how the author is defining male and female, and what about intersex people, and what about trans people, which were the things that kept coming up in this panel: the idea of gender and sex as a spectrum rather than a binary.
[info]nabonidus wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 05:44 pm (UTC)
Saidar is used by surrendering to it and becoming a channel, while saidin is used by mastering and bending it to your will.
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 07:49 pm (UTC)
Ah... that's-- potentially really creepy! Thanks for bringing it up.
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 01:10 am (UTC)
Food for thought
Also, I'm not sure any particular work of any kind needs to be a part of this discussion... I mean, that implies that people need to read/view that work or be familiar with it, in order to participate in the discussion. And that speaks to a certain kind of exclusion, I think, or a privileging of one type of work over another. This is more about how we read or view whatever kind of media we are consuming.

Yes, it's just one word choice, but I have word choice on my mind a lot lately.
[info]nabonidus wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 05:43 pm (UTC)
Re: Food for thought
Fair point.
[info]apostle_of_eris wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 04:41 pm (UTC)
I'm a little surprised not to see Cherryh's Chanur on the list. Aliens patterned after Terrestrial "big cats" with pride-like family structure.
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 05:11 pm (UTC)
This wasn't supposed to be a comprehensive list, just titles and topics that came up in discussion. But thanks for the rec!
[info]lunaesia wrote:
Jul. 5th, 2009 03:05 am (UTC)
We might as well expand the list while we're here ... that's half the fun!
Come on, let's all take a shot at Card's piggies! Males run around talking to each other and doing humanoid things, and are then consulted for wisdom once they pass into their tree form. Females are brainless animals, eaten alive from inside upon giving birth, or mothertrees, whose only "thought" is a deep-rooted (haha) instinct to nurture the young.

Still adore the books, though. Good times.
[info]sasha_feather wrote:
Jul. 6th, 2009 07:32 pm (UTC)
Re: We might as well expand the list while we're here ... that's half the fun!
Oh absolutely let's expand the list!
I'd forgotten all about the piggies-- I guess I hadn't realized they were all male! Thanks for mentioning them. I love those books too but boy do they have some issues.
( 21 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

ski pluto
[info]sasha_feather
Sasha_feather

Latest Month

December 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Carrie Keymel